I became a vegetarian in my mid-twenties, shortly after deciding to become a Zen Buddhist. It was the 1980s, the dawn of the “New Age,” and spiritual cultural appropriation was all the rage. But Buddhism was different. The spiritual part was optional. It was not a religion in the sense that I had previously understood the term; and the Zen variety was decidedly atheistic, a kind of applied philosophy that, as with most other Buddhist schools, highlighted an equality of worth among all sentient creatures. The last meat I ate after deciding to go vegetarian was a hot dog, actually three hot dogs, three greasy overcooked tubes of random animal flesh from the snack bar at a powerlifting contest. And, interesting side note, exactly a year later I competed in that same powerlifting contest as a vegetarian—something that my steak-and-chicken-breast-fed lifting buddies said would be impossible—and went home with a third-place trophy and a personal best deadlift.
Vegetarianism in the 1980s was nowhere near as popular as it is now, especially not among the working-class crowd I hung out with, and when people found out that I didn’t eat meat, their first response was usually a stunned “why the hell not?” I eventually amassed several stock replies to that question that I would vary depending on the circumstance. Sometimes I would simply say “because I’m Buddhist,” but that was rare, and almost guaranteed to lead to a further barrage of questions about Buddhism that required more time and energy to answer than I typically had patience for (I never did get very good at the whole Zen thing). Usually I gave some variation on the “animals are sentient beings too” moral argument against eating meat, a response that frequently led to a knee-jerk dismissive reaction, usually a flat denial that an animal’s status as a conscious, pain-experiencing being was at all relevant—followed by a “besides, bacon tastes good!” or the quasi-tongue-in-cheek “but plants are living creatures too!” Occasionally I would get a more extreme response. For example, I had one person call me a flaming hypocrite because I was wearing a leather belt and leather shoes and driving a car that ran on the combustible remains of once-living beings. I obviously didn’t really care about animals.
At the time, I didn’t understand the power of cognitive dissonance, and how most of the negative reactions I got were aimed at reducing the uncomfortable mental state that a moral argument for vegetarianism might be expected to elicit in meat eaters who considered themselves to be morally-grounded persons, otherwise I would have been far more careful to explain my meatlessness in ways that were less likely to be interpreted as pretentious or confrontational. It’s a joke these days, a running meme, that vegetarians are militant assholes, that they want to shove their vegetarianism down other people’s throats (pun intended) the way an evangelical Christian wants to infect you with their undying love for Jesus. And while there is no shortage of vegetarians who are like that, cognitive dissonance only aggravates the desire to put them in their place.
The potential for dissonance is also exacerbated by the fact that the moral argument from sentience is compelling, and, at least so I thought at the time, airtight. If you eat meat, you are saying that you are more important than the animals you are eating. You are saying that their pain and suffering is subservient to your pleasure. You are claiming that you have some kind of preordained right to kill and consume other experiencing beings. If that’s so, then where does this right come from? Every answer I got to that question was some variation on “might makes right.” “Why do I eat animals? Because I can: humans are at the top of the food chain.” I would also frequently get lectured on how a vegetarian diet was not healthy, a lecture for which I had a good stock of logical rebuttals and all sorts of data to the contrary. Hell, I placed in my weight class as a powerlifter after a year of zero meat consumption; physically, as a lean and muscular twenty-to-early-thirty-something, I looked to be the very opposite of unhealthy.
In the name of full transparency, I should mention that I am no longer vegetarian. And, just for the record, the reason I am no longer vegetarian has nothing to do with no longer calling myself Buddhist (although that happened too), or a change in my beliefs about the sanctity of nonhuman life (if anything, I hold these beliefs with even more conviction, although my thoroughgoing atheism makes me uncomfortable with the word sanctity), or the unjustifiable exercise of human death-dealing power (again, my convictions here are still as strong as they have ever been). The reason I am no longer vegetarian is because those things had nothing to do with why I became vegetarian in the first place. I am no longer vegetarian because I am no longer in my mid-twenties-to-early-thirties. With age I have become more adept at questioning my true motives, and at accepting the answers at face value despite how uncomfortable they might be (although the later capacity is still very much a work in progress). I have become better able to contend with my own cognitive dissonance, better able to live with ambiguity and contradiction in my thoughts and actions. The truth is that I was vegetarian mostly because most other folks weren’t. Vegetarianism was a safe way for me to express my deeply entrenched contrarian nature. It was the same reason that my car in high school was a small, gas-efficient pickup when all the other kids were into muscle cars. Being vegetarian allowed me to be different, to stand out from the crowd, to show that I wasn’t just another mindless sheep, to show that I was sophisticated, someone who lived intentionally. Or at least it allowed me to think these things about myself; it provided plausible support for a delusional narrative—a story woven as camouflage, ultimately to hide a seething mass of insecurities.
Continue reading “Too many vegetarians (or why plastic straws don’t matter)”